Parallels Desktop for Mac build 3120 RC1 is available for download.
01-10-2007, 06:03 PM
|
|
|---|---|
Tim Surgent Parallels Team Join: Mar 2006 Posts: 441 |
Parallels Desktop for Mac build 3120 RC1 is available for download. Hello everyone! Parallels Desktop for Mac build 3120 is now available for download. Additional details and download information is available on this page: http://www.parallels.com/products/desktop/beta_testing/ PLEASE REMEMBER: this is a Release Candidate software. While this build gives you the rough understanding of the final set of features to be available in Final Release later on, it is still a “Candidate” and thus is still not recommended for production use. Do backup your virtual machines before trying them with this build. This build introduces a new feature and provides several very important fixes to the problems found in previous Betas: * The widest list of fixes is USB ones! Web cameras should be working since this build. A number of other devices reported non-working by beta-testers in previous builds should work now as well. The known issues list is below: * iSight doesn’t work yet. You will notice it sending data, but no picture available* True “Drag and Drop” functionality - a long awaited feature that lets you seamlessly drag and drop files and folders from Windows to Mac OS X and vice versa. Parallels Desktop now shares the entire Mac file structure between OS X and Windows - no more worrying about which copy of the file is the most recently updated! * If, for some reason, you need to return to previous “Drag and Drop” implementation, just enter VM Configuration Editor, select Shared Folders and uncheck the “Enable Global Sharing for drag-and-drop” option.* Stability fixes – lots of segmentation fault (Parallels Desktop window closes unexpectedly) conditions are now fixed - thanks to everyone for reporting those! * The nasty bug with Suspend/Resume and invalid windows areas handling while in Coherence is now gone. * And many other less evident fixes… Once again I would like to encourage you to send your bug reports to beta@parallels.com mailbox. Be it non-working USB device, a description of your Boot Camp installation that fails to boot inside Parallels Desktop box or the specific application that is not handled correctly by Coherence – we are interested in any feedback that lets us improve Parallels Desktop and deliver the best product to you! Best regards, Tim and the Parallels Team |
01-10-2007, 06:51 PM
|
||
|---|---|---|
Olivier Senior Member Join: Apr 2006 Posts: 286 |
Quote:
Now testing... First thing, on my XP VM, after installing new VM tools and rebooting, I had the warning that hardware config changed significantly. I had to re-activate. Not a big issue for me anyway, just wanted to mention it. Short of this, both my XP VM and my Vista VM seems to run perfectly (but I have been running 3120 only for an hour or so - saw your announce on the web site before your post here). __________________ Best Regards, Olivier. |
|
01-10-2007, 07:13 PM
|
|
|---|---|
rufosx Junior Member Join: Sep 2006 Posts: 19 |
I'm still seeing a massive memory leak in my VMs, same as 3106. My VM that I opened with 428 MB of memory about 5 hours ago with 3120 has now consumed 761 MB of real memory and 2.64 GB of virtual memory. It goes up another 200 KB avery 5 secs. This is still a show stopping, data loss bug for me. I'm considering backing down to a much older version of parallels so I can actually be sure my VM wouldn't suddenly crash. |
01-10-2007, 07:19 PM
|
|
|---|---|
Tim Surgent Parallels Team Join: Mar 2006 Posts: 441 |
rufosx, I would appreciate an extended report about the problem like rhind posted here http://forum.parallels.com/post38087-28.html Please copy this stuff to beta@parallels.com mailbox as well. TIA. Best regards, Tim |
01-10-2007, 07:52 PM
|
|
|---|---|
maverick808 Senior Member Join: Apr 2006 Posts: 169 |
Can I also ask about the Parallels naming scheme? How on earth can you have a Release Candidate when there are known bugs, and quite severe ones? It can only be a release candidate if you think this version might actually be ready to go... but surely you don't since you know it has bugs?
__________________ WiFiFoFum Pocket PC Wardriving www.aspecto-software.com |
01-10-2007, 08:28 PM
|
|
|---|---|
jbcaro Junior Member Join: Nov 2006 Posts: 26 |
Does Parallels still not work if you have more than one windows partition? While I don't need more than one while in Parallels, I do need more than one when running boot camp since I need a seperate scratch disk. Until this is fixed, Parallels is usless to me since all windows drives show up on the Mac desktop. john |
01-10-2007, 08:29 PM
|
||
|---|---|---|
Narin Junior Member Join: Jun 2006 Posts: 19 |
Quote:
I have 2gb of RAM in my MacBook, and 492mb assigned to Parallels. Virtual memory is 2GB on launch and stays around there. |
|
01-10-2007, 08:52 PM
|
||
|---|---|---|
don montalvo Senior Member Join: May 2006 Posts: 111 |
Quote:
don __________________ don montalvo, nyc curmudgeon at large |
|
01-10-2007, 09:18 PM
|
|
|---|---|
MysticalOS Junior Member Join: Dec 2006 Posts: 14 |
I feel like i wasted my time reporting all the bugs i found in beta 3 to forums and email, got no replies in either or and they weren't fixed in this build. :\ |
01-10-2007, 09:29 PM
|
|
|---|---|
purephase Junior Member Join: Dec 2006 Posts: 16 |
Any chance that Vista and Bootcamp will be supported before the final release? I realize it's RC now so it's probably on feature freeze, but I thought I'd ask anyway. Thanks! Keep up the great work. Despite the inquiry, this product rocks. |
01-10-2007, 09:47 PM
|
|
|---|---|
dkp Senior Member Join: May 2006 Posts: 1,416 |
Tim - This has been a very good release. My earlier problems that came up after the replacements of 1970 have all disappeared. Of primary interest, my full screen (1440x900) screens are back for Solaris. My Treo phone syncs perfectly in OS X. CPU temperatures are down and system resources are in the acceptable range. Too soon to know if this last will creep or stay stable but it's starting out in the black and holding. That translates to battery life and that is a good thing! And my thumb drive migrates cleanly among the various VMs perfectly. This is a little thing but it is a *big* little thing for me. I'd like to offer a special thank you for the quality and completeness of the release announcement. We can know better what to expect and what your team is still working hard on. Kudos to you and the entire team for an ever more excellent product. It just gets better. I have to confess I have really enjoyed watching this product launch, take off, and grow. I second Don's sentiment - turn off the cell phones and take a well deserved break! |
01-10-2007, 09:48 PM
|
|
|---|---|
maverick808 Senior Member Join: Apr 2006 Posts: 169 |
What is with the MASSIVE .mem file? Is this a copy of the VMs RAM? Is this also why Parallels now takes about 20 times as long to start up my VM? I notice the VM now suspends and resumes really quickly. Is this what this .mem file enables? If so, I'd rather have an option to create this file as I don't want it, and I'd rather the machine didn't take about 5 minutes to start up in the first place. __________________ WiFiFoFum Pocket PC Wardriving www.aspecto-software.com |
01-10-2007, 09:53 PM
|
||
|---|---|---|
drval Senior Member Join: Dec 2006 Posts: 490 |
Quote:
__________________ The Power of NeuroCARE www.zengar.com |
|
01-10-2007, 10:02 PM
|
||
|---|---|---|
dkp Senior Member Join: May 2006 Posts: 1,416 |
Quote:
Edit: I did check it and the .sav file disappeared after unsuspending the session. The .mem file lingers on. If that is what is responsible for the faster performance I'm happy with it. The .mem file is 1.5g here. Not that bad. |
|
01-10-2007, 10:24 PM
|
||
|---|---|---|
dkp Senior Member Join: May 2006 Posts: 1,416 |
Quote:
|
|
01-10-2007, 10:27 PM
|
||
|---|---|---|
maverick808 Senior Member Join: Apr 2006 Posts: 169 |
Quote:
If this is the cause of the slow startups then I'd prefer if I had the choice to turn it off. If it's slow startups and speedy resumes VS fast startups and slow resumes I'd take the latter option. However, I understand many would take the former, which is why I suggest this become a user-selectable option. __________________ WiFiFoFum Pocket PC Wardriving www.aspecto-software.com |
|
01-10-2007, 10:29 PM
|
||
|---|---|---|
maverick808 Senior Member Join: Apr 2006 Posts: 169 |
Quote:
__________________ WiFiFoFum Pocket PC Wardriving www.aspecto-software.com |
|
01-10-2007, 10:52 PM
|
|
|---|---|
Hagbard Junior Member Join: Nov 2006 Posts: 29 |
Build 3120 seems solid with my GNU/Linux machines so far. Most importantly, it looks like I'm no longer experiencing continuously growing memory usage. CPU utilization is lower, down to the mid 20% range rather than mid 30% range when guest is mostly idle. There is less graphic 'tearing' during rapid window scrolling and performance feels generally more reponsive. This is a very preliminary impression based on less than an hour of use, but it seems this build is more efficient than the betas, although still heavier than 1970. |
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
| Search this thread | Forum jump |
|---|---|
| Thread tools | Display modes |
|---|---|
|
Linear Mode
|